Current position: Home>>Justice>>Reform of the Supreme Judicial Council: "The method was not the best"

Reform of the Supreme Judicial Council: "The method was not the best"

July 22 category:Justice
sponsored links

Reform of the Supreme Judicial Council: "The method was not the best"



According to André Vallini, we must give the initiative to parliament

Henri Porchier / Dauphine Libere The AGI / PhotoPQR /



Why reform of the Supreme Council of the Magistracy she had to be adjourned by the government?

It is a disappointment, and the method was not necessarily the best. An external committee in parliament worked under the chairmanship of Lionel Jospin, and the government has tried to vote on a text that Parliament has felt as a government reform ... that would appear as the victory of one side against the other!

What do you suggest?

It is essential to try to give this reform in parliament. To do this, set up a bicameral commission, composed equally of deputies and senators, parity of elected left and right, with a leftist president and a rapporteur on the right, or the reverse. And let there work long it takes, we are not close to six months for constitutional reform.

But you had already proposed last spring ...

Yes, because I sensed the failure of today, and was told he was not sure. You actually get out of our presidentialist culture and give the initiative to the parliament. The method I propose would not be victimized again thought of back and posture, to overcome partisan divisions.

Are you sure that your method would lead to success?

No, but try and not stay on a failure; particularly since large institutional reforms are needed, beginning with the CSM. It is essential for the floors are autonomous and prosecutors appointments be made independently of political power.

CopyRight © 2018 crownint.com All Right Reserved. webmaster#crownint.com 12 q. 0.141 s.